July 22, 2009
NEW STATE REPORT CARDS
RELEASED BY WORK LOSS DATA INSTITUTE
Encinitas, CA – Work Loss Data Institute (WLDI)
announces the release of the much-anticipated 2009 State Report Cards for
Workers’ Comp, using the most current data available at this time. The
report cards help employers, insurers, TPA’s, state governments and
consultants answer the questions, “Who is doing well and why?”
WLDI’s State Report Cards are based on data from OSHA
Form 300’s and 200’s, which cover all OSHA recordable injuries and illnesses
and provide the basis for rating state-by-state workers’ compensation
performance. The 2009 release adds four more years worth of data (2003-2006)
to the rankings, which makes for a total of seven years of data since it
includes statistics collected in the last publication, which was released in
2004.
Now having seven years worth of data, it was possible
to track trends and not only give states a grade based on most current
performance, but also to give them a “Tier Ranking” based on how they
performed on average over the seven years, and whether they have an upward,
downward or stable trend. There is data available for 43 states, plus Puerto
Rico, Guam and the Virgin Islands.
Similar to past releases of this report, the 2009 State
Report Cards also provide five different outcome measures compared among the
states for each year: (1) Incidence Rates, (2) Cases Missing Work, (3)
Median Disability Durations, (4) Delayed Recovery Rate; and (5) Key
Conditions: Low Back Strain. An essential requirement for production of this
report was the proprietary crosswalk program that has been developed by Work
Loss Data Institute, which converts OSHA-reported data into an ICD9 code
format. More details on the methodology used are located at http://www.worklossdata.com/SRCMethods2009.htm.
Iowa performed the best of all the states for 2006 and
Minnesota came in a close second. Both states received a grade of “A+” based
on an average of their 2006 scores in the five categories above. Illinois
came in last, with Wyoming, Rhode Island and New York very close to the
bottom. In total, nine of the 43 states received a grade of “F” in 2006. A
summary of each grade for all states is shown on a U.S. Map Showing Grades
by State.
In terms of the tier ranking system, the Tier I states
are Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Utah and Virginia. Tier I means that the state
had an average grade of “B+” or better, and a trend going up or level. Those
five states were doing great and continuing to improve. Eight states fell
into the opposite category – Tier VI – which means they had an average grade
of “D-“ or worse, and a trend going down or level. The worst performers for
the years 2000-2006 were: Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York,
Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas and Wyoming. A summary of Tier Rankings for
all states is shown on a U.S. Map Showing
Tiers by State.
The WLDI special report, entitled 2009 State Report
Cards for Workers’ Comp provides complete detail on all cases
for the 46 participating states and territories,
based on all cases reported to OSHA for the years 2000-2006 as a 79-page
report with narrative, plus over 50 spreadsheet files with complete detailed
backup data that is referenced in the narrative. It is available in both
electronic and hardcopy formats for $250 each. Note: The electronic format
is recommended to facilitate links to the electronic spreadsheet files and
the supporting data. Click here to order: http://www.worklossdata.com/SRC_Orderform.htm.
Work Loss Data Institute is an independent database
development company focused on workplace health and productivity based in
Encinitas, California. The Official Disability Guidelines product line
provides evidence-based medical treatment and disability duration guidelines
to improve as well as benchmark outcomes in workers’ comp and
non-occupational disability. ODG is available in Web-based, textbook and
Systems Integration formats, used in all 50 states and worldwide. For more
information, visit
www.worklossdata.com or contact Work Loss Data Institute at
800-488-5548.
